туточки наконец Aviation Week Network снеслись http://aviationweek.com/defense/mh17-downed-sa-11-missile-us-intel-confirms (требует регистрацию, но она наперво халявная) Как думаете, стоит тащить в комунну или всё давно разобрано?
But during an Aug. 12 speech at the 2015 Space and Missile Defense Conference in Huntsville, Alabama, a senior intelligence official briefly addressed the matter. And she confirmed the assessment with Aviation Week during an interview following her presentation.
National Geospatial Intelligence Agency Deputy Director Sue Gordon outlined for the audience how the agency’s mission relies on well-honed experience tying linking imagery with other forms of intelligence. And as the agency’s name notes, its power is in linking events from various sources to specific times and locations on the globe. “It’s expertise like that that’s essential when NGA needs to assess things like the responsibility for the SA-11 that shot down Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 over Ukraine,” she said.
Gordon declined in the interview to explain what led the community to its confidence in the assessment. “You can imagine that our strength of our sensors are in the coverage we have and taking specific information that allows us to identify when things happen in time and space – when things happen in the air and on the ground,” she said. In this case, U.S. “sensors” – most likely overhead reconnaissance satellites collecting electro-optical, radar and infrared images – probably were monitoring the area heavily. Russia had annexed Crimea and Russian-backed forces were pushing into Eastern Ukraine; U.S. intelligence also was monitoring movements of weapons to the front. “It is in the combination of those things that when you look at what is a commercial event that can you can say, ‘Oh, now that [event] had to be far from that location. That it had to be there not here, based on just geometries … That is a science problem and it is a mathematical problem of geometries. It just happens that because of our mission we are looking at those areas and can bring that to bear,” Gordon said.
In the case of ignition of a surface-to-air missile, U.S. satellites, specifically the Defense Support Program and Space-Based Infrared System, would easily pick up the signature of the motor and, possibly, track it during its flight. Because the SA-11 is a known system, U.S. intelligence likely has vast databases of knowledge on its operation and infrared signature; U.S. signals intelligence, imaging and infrared satellites monitor foreign missile tests to gather this knowledge, adding to a library of facts about hostile missile systems globally.
A Dutch-led Joint Investigation Team (JIT) comprising experts from Australia, Belgium, Malaysia, the Netherlands and Ukraine confirmed Aug. 11 that it was investigating several parts it had recovered from the wreckage of the downed airliner that they believe originated from a Buk, or SA-11, surface-to-air missile system. The JIT says it is investigating the origin of these parts with the help of experts including forensic and weapons specialists.
“At present the conclusion cannot be drawn that there is a causal connection between the discovered parts and the crash of flight MH17,” the JIT said in a statement.
In May, the JIT began a criminal investigation into the apparent transportation of a Buk missile system that was filmed and photographed being moved by several eyewitnesses in the region.
But what remains unanswered from the incident is how alleged separatists got the SA-11 and who ordered the shot.
Gordon, a veteran of 25 years at the Central Intelligence Agency, adds that “there is always still a judgment call because in any intelligence product there is always uncertainty. And in the case of a commercial airliner, there is a court of law.”
Gordon likened the agency’s contribution to the MH17 incident to its participation in tracking and helping to curb last year’s Ebola outbreak in Africa. “We didn’t create new content for Ebola. We didn’t develop sensors for Ebola. It just turns out that the information that we collected in the conduct of our business could be used to support that mission,” she said. “So we figured out how to make it available in a way that it could be used there. Well, the same thing [happened] in the case of the commercial airliner … It isn’t about collecting against [the incident], it is taking collections and seeing if you can add certainty and then finding a way for that to be used.”
Спасибо! В принципе, здесь есть несколько интересных моментов. Нового тут ничего нет, но - самый главный момент: о данных разведспутников говорит не политик или представитель администрации, а НАЗВАННЫЙ сотрудник разведки. По-моему, это верный признак того, что данные переданы и будут в будущем (недалёком) рассекречены.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2015-08-14 08:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-14 08:46 am (UTC)А Радищев с Ленинградкой вас не насторожил?
no subject
Date: 2015-08-14 08:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-14 09:14 am (UTC)А оригинал той книжки находится легко:
ДЫК!!!!!!!
Date: 2015-08-15 02:40 pm (UTC)Очень высококачественная копия книги.(рекомендую!)
Бабушка Сары Коннор была еврейкой из Минска %)
Date: 2015-08-14 03:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-14 04:31 pm (UTC)http://aviationweek.com/defense/mh17-downed-sa-11-missile-us-intel-confirms (требует регистрацию, но она наперво халявная)
Как думаете, стоит тащить в комунну или всё давно разобрано?
no subject
Date: 2015-08-14 04:39 pm (UTC)А вы полный текст читали?
no subject
Date: 2015-08-14 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-14 04:51 pm (UTC)National Geospatial Intelligence Agency Deputy Director Sue Gordon outlined for the audience how the agency’s mission relies on well-honed experience tying linking imagery with other forms of intelligence. And as the agency’s name notes, its power is in linking events from various sources to specific times and locations on the globe. “It’s expertise like that that’s essential when NGA needs to assess things like the responsibility for the SA-11 that shot down Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 over Ukraine,” she said.
Gordon declined in the interview to explain what led the community to its confidence in the assessment. “You can imagine that our strength of our sensors are in the coverage we have and taking specific information that allows us to identify when things happen in time and space – when things happen in the air and on the ground,” she said. In this case, U.S. “sensors” – most likely overhead reconnaissance satellites collecting electro-optical, radar and infrared images – probably were monitoring the area heavily. Russia had annexed Crimea and Russian-backed forces were pushing into Eastern Ukraine; U.S. intelligence also was monitoring movements of weapons to the front. “It is in the combination of those things that when you look at what is a commercial event that can you can say, ‘Oh, now that [event] had to be far from that location. That it had to be there not here, based on just geometries … That is a science problem and it is a mathematical problem of geometries. It just happens that because of our mission we are looking at those areas and can bring that to bear,” Gordon said.
no subject
Date: 2015-08-14 04:51 pm (UTC)A Dutch-led Joint Investigation Team (JIT) comprising experts from Australia, Belgium, Malaysia, the Netherlands and Ukraine confirmed Aug. 11 that it was investigating several parts it had recovered from the wreckage of the downed airliner that they believe originated from a Buk, or SA-11, surface-to-air missile system. The JIT says it is investigating the origin of these parts with the help of experts including forensic and weapons specialists.
“At present the conclusion cannot be drawn that there is a causal connection between the discovered parts and the crash of flight MH17,” the JIT said in a statement.
In May, the JIT began a criminal investigation into the apparent transportation of a Buk missile system that was filmed and photographed being moved by several eyewitnesses in the region.
But what remains unanswered from the incident is how alleged separatists got the SA-11 and who ordered the shot.
Gordon, a veteran of 25 years at the Central Intelligence Agency, adds that “there is always still a judgment call because in any intelligence product there is always uncertainty. And in the case of a commercial airliner, there is a court of law.”
Gordon likened the agency’s contribution to the MH17 incident to its participation in tracking and helping to curb last year’s Ebola outbreak in Africa. “We didn’t create new content for Ebola. We didn’t develop sensors for Ebola. It just turns out that the information that we collected in the conduct of our business could be used to support that mission,” she said. “So we figured out how to make it available in a way that it could be used there. Well, the same thing [happened] in the case of the commercial airliner … It isn’t about collecting against [the incident], it is taking collections and seeing if you can add certainty and then finding a way for that to be used.”
no subject
Date: 2015-08-14 05:19 pm (UTC)В принципе, здесь есть несколько интересных моментов.
Нового тут ничего нет, но -
самый главный момент: о данных разведспутников говорит не политик или представитель администрации, а НАЗВАННЫЙ сотрудник разведки. По-моему, это верный признак того, что данные переданы и будут в будущем (недалёком) рассекречены.
Я сейчас ещё по-внимательнее почитаю цитаты
СПАСИБО!!!
Date: 2015-08-15 02:42 pm (UTC)